Publications by CTUR Members

Publication date between
Jonathan Gershuny
IT & Society
Published: 2 September 2002

The impact of the Internet is put into the context of long-term, time-use trends in the United Kingdom, taking advantage of almost 40 years of time-diary studies. The trends in time use that emerge challenge several popular beliefs about how society has been changing in the wake of new technology and other social changes since WWII. The main focus of the analysis is on a unique set of panel data in which respondents in nearly 1000 households completed full-week diaries in 1999 and 2000, making it possible to distinguish changes in three groups: prior Internet users, nonusers at both time points and new Internet users. No notable changes in media use or other activities were found in any of the three groups across the span of the study, indicating little support for the hypothesis that Internet users had significantly altered their styles of life.

Jonathan Gershuny
IT & Society
Published: 3 June 2002

The impact of the Internet is put into the context of long-term, time-use trends in the United Kingdom, taking advantage of the nearly 40 years of time-diary studies that have been conducted. These trends in time use challenge several popular beliefs about how society has been changing in the wake of new technology and other social changes since WWII. The main focus of the analysis, however, is on a unique set of panel data in which respondents in nearly 1000 households completed full-week diaries in 1999 and 2000, making it possible to distinguish changes in three groups: prior Internet users, nonusers at both time points and new Internet users. No notable changes in social life were found in any of the three groups across the span of the study, indicating little support for the hypothesis of Internet users suffering significant losses in social life.

Oriel Sullivan, Jonathan Gershuny
British Journal of Sociology
Published: 1 June 2001
Oriel Sullivan, Jonathan Gershuny
British Journal of Sociology
Published: 1 June 2001

The paper addresses some macro-sociological questions about changes in broad categories of time-use. The focus is on large-scale cross-national time trends from developed countries in paid and unpaid work, and leisure. Reference is made to some well-known sociological and historical accounts of such change, and to the fact that time-use diary data has only relatively recently become available for analysing trends over time. The data used are drawn from a comparative cross-time data archive held by the Institute for Social and Economic Research at Essex University, comprising successive time-use diary surveys from a range of industrialized countries collected from the 1960s to the 1990s. The time use evidence suggests relative stability in the balance between work and leisure time over the period covered by the analyses. Some alternative explanations are advanced for why there seems to be a gap between this evidence and, on the one hand, the burgeoning literature in both academic and popular media addressing the 'time famine' and, on the other, people's professed experience of what is happening to their time.

Oriel Sullivan
Sociology
Published: 1 August 2000

This paper addresses two important questions in the area of the division of domestic labour. Firstly, what change is observable in the patterns of men and women's time spent in domestic labour over the past twenty years, when taking into account structural factors such as employment patterns and social class? Secondly, among which groups of the population of couples can change be identified? One of the problems of this area of research has been that relatively few studies have systematically analysed change over time using directly comparable large-scale data. Here I present a detailed examination of the nature and pattern of change in the domestic division of labour among couples in Britain based on nationally representative time-use diary data collected in 1975, 1987 and 1997. The data are drawn from a cross-national data archive held by the Institute for Social and Economic Research at the University of Essex. Notwithstanding the fact that in 1997 women still performed the bulk of domestic work, it is found that, in relation to changes in time use in other areas of life, the increase in men's participation in domestic work (at least as measured in terms of time contributed) should be regarded as significant. In support of this, there had been (i) a reduction in gender inequality in the performance of some of the normatively feminine-associated tasks, (ii) a larger proportional increase in the time contributed to domestic work tasks by men from lower socio-economic strata, to a position of near equality with men from higher socio-economic positions, and (iii) a substantial increase in more ‘egalitarian’ couples.

Oriel Sullivan
British Journal of Sociology
Published: 1 December 1998
Jonathan Gershuny, Oriel Sullivan
European Sociological Review
Published: 1 March 1998
Oriel Sullivan
Sociology
Published: 1 May 1997

Quite a lot is already known from the existing sociological literature about the overall time spent by women and men in different domestic tasks, but there is much less information available on more complex sociologically-relevant facets of the experience of time, such as the social context of activities, and the common combinations of different activities. In this paper I use time-use diary data to focus upon three important aspects of the gendered experience of time. These are the social context of domestic tasks in relation to their (gendered) patterns of management, the intensity or density of time-use involving combinations of different activities, and the fragmentation of leisure time according to which activities are responsible for interrupting it. Overall these analyses support the conclusion that women's time is not only more pressured in terms of the intensity of domestic tasks, but that the more enjoyable aspects of their time, such as leisure time, tend to be more fragmented than that of men.

Oriel Sullivan
Journal of Family Issues
Published: 3 March 1997

There are only a limited number of studies comparing housework among couples and individuals in different marital statuses, and the focus of attention has tended to be on married compared to cohabiting couples. This article focuses on differences between couples where one or more partner is remarried or recohabiting and those where both partners are in their first married or cohabiting relationships, using nationally representative survey data from Britain. It is shown in multivariate analysis that women in their second-plus partnerships contribute less in terms of their proportion of total housework time than women in their first partnerships. However, there is no effect for the man's number of previous partnerships or for current marital/cohabiting status. It is argued that the significant issue is interaction and negotiation with a subsequent partner in the light of experience gained from the breakdown of one or more previous married/cohabiting relationships.

Oriel Sullivan
Social Indicators Research
Published: 1 May 1996

In this paper I investigate the use of a measure of well-being derived from time-use data on the enjoyment of activities, and explore the association between the well-being of partners. The measure of well-being used is directly derived from the subjective assessment of the enjoyment of activities as recorded in time-use diaries. It is shown that this measure yeilds plausible results which share many of the characteristics of other measures of well-being. In addition, since the diaries used in the analysis were collected from couples it has also been possible to investigate the association between the well-being of partners. It is shown that in multivariate analyses including both time-use and socio-demographic variables the effect of a partner's well-being has by far the most significant impact on individual well-being. It is argued that this combination of information offers a useful means of analysing the relationship between time-use, well-being and the couple relationship. In this sense the analysis cross-cuts some of the conventional disciplinary boundaries which have served to separate the study of emotional relationships and psychological states from that of the daily activities of households.

Oriel Sullivan
Sociology
Published: 1 February 1996

In this paper the time-use of diaries of a sample of couples are used to explore the relationship between partners' daily pattern of activities and their enjoyment of those activities. By analysing the diaries of couples together it is possible to assess which activities are undertaken simultaneously, which separately, and whether time spent in different activities is more enjoyable spent separately or together. So, in addition to the usual information obtainable from time diary analysis on the domestic division of labour, these data provide information on the quality of time, and the ways in which couples may manipulate it in order to increase the proportion of enjoyable time (which, it is shown, is more enjoyable when enjoyed together). The wider significance of this approach is that an empirical link is provided between `work-related' debates on the domestic division of labour, and those on the nature of affective relationships between couples found within the sociology of emotions.

Jonathan Gershuny, John P Robinson
Demography
Published: 1 November 1988
Time Use, Technology and the Future of Work
Jonathan Gershuny
Journal of the Market Research Society
Published: 1 October 1986
Time Budgets: Preliminary Analyses of a National Survey
Jonathan Gershuny, Ian Miles, Sally Jones, Christine Mullings, Graham Thomas, Sally Wyatt
Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs
Published: 2 June 1986
Jonathan Gershuny
Futures
Published: 4 April 1977

There is a popular view of the current pattern of change in developed societies, a view typified by Daniel Bell's The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, that recent economic growth has been increasingly concentrated in the collective provision of services rather than in individual consumption of material goods, and that this change of economic focus from goods to services is a trend which will continue into the future. The author argues, using UK data, that the trend is in fact away from the expenditure on services and towards expenditure on goods. The growing employment in the tertiary sector, previously used as an indicator of the growth of the service economy, emerges here as a manifestation of the division of labour—a process which increases the efficiency of production of material goods—while the final production of services, using automatic machinery and “direct labour”, will increasingly take place in the home.

Jonathan Gershuny, Michael Bittman, Adrian E Bauman.
BMC Public Health

Adrian Bauman, Michael Bittman, and Jonathan Gershuny, BMC Public Health 2019 
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6760-y

This paper is a narrative review examining the history of time use research, and the potential uses of TU data for public health research. The history of TUR started in studies of the labour force and patterns of work in the late 19th and early twentieth century, but has more recently been applied to examining health issues. Initial studies had a more economic purpose but over recent decades, TU data have been used to describe the distribution and correlates of health-enhancing patterns of human time use. These studies require large multi-country population data sets, such as the harmonised Multinational Time Use Study hosted at the University of Oxford. TU data are used in physical activity research, as they provide information across the 24-h day, that can be examined as time spent sleeping, sitting/standing/light activity, and time spent in moderate-vigorous activities. TU data are also used for sleep research, examining eating and dietary patterns, exploring geographic distributions in time use behaviours, examining mental health and subjective wellbeing, and examining these data over time. The key methodological challenge has been the development of harmonised methods, so population TU data sets can be compared within and between-countries and over time.